|
|
AgAlerts From Griggs County |
Issue # 4, June 27, 2000
FUNGICIDE DECISIONS AND TIMING FOR SMALL GRAINS
Last week's rains certainly may change the story of
possible disease problems in Griggs County. A week to 10 days is necessary for
disease infections to become evident in small grains, once environmental
conditions trigger fungal sporulation and spread. Diligent scouting will be
necessary now and during the next few weeks to determine disease threat.
Small grain producers MUST assess the condition of their
crops before making a fungicide decision.
1) A waterlogged field with long standing water has a high potential for root
rot and crown death. Such a field is not a good candidate for protecting against
leaf and head diseases.
2) Crops flattened by wind, heavy rain, or hail may not recover enough to
warrant fungicide treatment. Wait a few days to assess how the crop recovers.
NDSU does not have data on the effect of fungicides on severely lodged grains.
3) Crops in the early heading and flowering stages will be the best candidates
for fungicide protection. Winter wheat crops that have already flowered and are
in kernel development may be beyond the need for fungicide application.
Spring wheat crops with high yield potential and at the early
flowering stage have the highest potential to benefit from fungicide treatment.
Head scab is a looming threat, because the saturated soils are going to favor
spore production along with high humidities and dew points necessary for disease
development.
NDSU fungicide research has consistently shown that the
optimum timing of fungicide application for Fusarium head scab control is at
early flowering for spring wheat and durum, and at early full head emergence for
barley. These stages equal Feekes 10.51 for wheat and durum, and Feekes 10.5 for
barley (barley flowers while head in boot). Early flowering means that 10-25% of
the main stems are flowering, while tillers have not started yet.
These fungicide timings also have given excellent control of
tan spot, Septoria leaf blotch, and leaf rust. Our leaf disease pressure so far
hasn't warranted a fungicide application at boot stage, but this could change in
the next 10 days. NDSU Extension Service circular AE-1148 'Application of
fungicides for suppression of Fusarium head blight (scab)' should be consulted
to aid in effectively applying fungicides. A summary of the recommendations
include the following:
WHITE MOLD CONCERNS FOR ROW CROPS AND CANOLA
Recent rains, along with the heavy infestation of sunflower head rot last fall, may be the perfect conditions for the dispersal of sclerotinia spores. Critical infections stages for susceptible crops are as follows.
Sunflower: This crop can be infected by more than one method. The most
common infection is sclerotinia stalk rot. This is when the sunflower root comes
into contact with a sclerotinia fruiting bodies. Symptoms usually begin to show
up at flowering. This is when the plant begins to wilt and the base of the plant
will have a bleached appearance. Shortly after wilting the plant cannot support
itself and break over. Infections usually appear in spots and can spread by root
grafting.
The second method of infection is mid-stalk rot. This is
similar to stalk rot, only the infection takes place by spore that land on an
injury or other type of wound on the stalk. Again infection sites will take on a
bleached appearance and later cause the plant to break off.
The third method of infection is head rot. This was very
serious in 1999. This is caused by spore dispersal during flowering. The spores
will infect the flowers and slowing begin to consume the head causing the heads
to shatter and have a stringy appearance.
As of now, nothing is cleared for control or prevention of
white mold in sunflower. Our only defense is the dry weather.
Canola: There is only one infection period in canola. This is during flowering and sclerotinia spores are present. They will infect dead or dying blossoms then penetrate the stalk and cause the plants to have bleached branches that will not produce any seed. These infections are very noticeable and can cause yield losses in accordance with the percent of infection. There are two fungicides that have labeled for prevention, Quadris and Ridomil (section 18).
Quadris: apply at 10 to 25% bloom (about 3-7 days after flowers are detected). Rate=9.2 to 15.4 fl oz/acre (9.2 fl oz/acre is suggested at a cost of about $21-22/acre plus application costs).
Ronilan: apply at 20 to 50% bloom (about 4-8 days after flowering begins). Rate=10.6 to 16 oz/acre (suggested rate is 12 oz/acre at a cost of about $16/acre plus application costs). Consult labels for details before use.
Soybeans: Infections occur during flowering and are more severe when soybeans are solid seeded verses rows. Usually, white mold has not been a major concern in soybeans, but as more beans are solid seeded, we are seeing more problems.
Drybeans: Infections occur during flowering and are usually more severe in pinto beans than navy beans. Rain events 10 days prior to flowering provide ideal conditions for possible white mold infection. Most common fungicides used are Benlate or Topsin. Both products have shown good control and yield increases. There is some work being done in the counties of Griggs, Steele and Traill, using liquid calcium as a carrier. There has been some good results, but at this time the jury is still out. Under heavy disease pressure, the full fungicide rate is still recomended.
BE AWARE OF HERBICIDE INJURY ON YELLOW SOYBEANS
Recent research at NDSU has shown that soybeans that are chlorodic or under excess moisture conditions, are more likely to be injured when sprayed with herbicides. The question arises, are we going to cause more damage with the herbicide or by not controlling weeds. In 1998 and 1999, Dave Franzen did some studies in four locations to determine what type of injury each herbicide had on soybeans under moisture or salt stress. Each herbicide had some injury with some of the burndown products such as Cobra and Blazer tended to hurt the beans a little more. When determining whether to wait for the plants to recover will depend on weed pressure. High weed pressure can cause high yield losses but also could also help protect the soybeans from receiving high doses of product. In conclusion, we must look at all the conditions and crop potential. Drowned out spots will not recover so then evaluate the remaining stand. Under high chlorosis conditions, be prepared for some damage. But if the weed pressure is high, treating will probably be a better alternative than waiting for recovery. To get further information on this study, go to the following web site: http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/aginfo/entomology/ndsucpr/Years/2000/June/1st/soils_1june00.htm#HERBICIDES.
Please Contact Our Office For Additional Information
E-mail: griggs@ndsuext.nodak.edu
Go to the 2000 AgAlert Index Page