|
|||||
|
July 15, 2004 Accuracy of Forage Sample, It’s in Your Hands
Knowing the quality of forage is paramount to pricing, whether you are buying or selling. Hay sampling is probably the most important aspect of forage quality testing. Accuracy is in the hands of the sampler. When you think about it, we expect a lot from very little. A pinkie-sized ground-up sample weighing less than a gram must represent tons of hay from a variety of fields. Once in the lab, this gram is sub-sampled from about a half-pound of material provided by the sampler, so it is critical that the sample given to the lab accurately represents the hay being tested. Whether the sample accurately represents a stack is the responsibility of the sampler. The lab can only test the sample presented to them! Weather damage and delayed harvest has had a significant effect on hay, especially alfalfa. The proportion of protein and fiber of leaves and stems are very different and influenced by harvest stage and conditions. To determine nutrient quantity and quality, the sample of forage must represent the leaf to stem ratio of the bales, as well as the weed composition of the hay. Both can vary considerably across and between fields. Aside from supply and demand issues, accurate analysis of forage can be the single greatest determinant of price. Following proper protocols will help the sampler obtain a fair, representative sample of the hay lot. When these sampling protocols are followed closely, different samplers can usually repeat the lab measurements within a reasonable range. These protocols are fairly universal, but they do vary slightly from region to region. Here are some important steps and guidelines for taking alfalfa hay samples:
Many disputes about hay testing results can be attributed to differences in sampling methods. The principle of hay sampling is to obtain randomly chosen samples, which represent the average composition of the hay stack or lot. Never present an un-cored sample to a lab such as a flake or a small handful of forage. Research has shown that, if these simple guidelines are followed, reliable results can be obtained, even if you are using different probes or people. Nonetheless, a minimum of +/- 0.5 percent variation in results is normal and should be expected due to typical variations in sample and lab practices. ### Source: J.W.
Schroeder, (701) 231-7663, jw.schroeder@ndsu.nodak.edu |
Market Advisor: |
|
North Dakota State University |